baseline is the original Greek and Hebrew, so what we compare all versions to is the best text we can produce, our favourite translation. In Christ Jesus our Lord, And what do we know about these men who made themselves the judges over Gods holy Word? Westcott and Hort distinguished four text types in their studies. Many modern versions like the New International Version (450 million copies worldwide), English Standard Version, Holman Christian Standard Bible, New Living Translation, New Century Version, Amplified Bible, New English Translation and New American Standard Bible have been produced by the finest Bible believing scholars in the world. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward" (1 Timothy 5:18). Brother Cloud lives in South Asia where he has been a church planting missionary since 1979. But HORT DID NOT FAIL TO REACH HIS MAJOR GOAL. However the majority of these manuscripts agree with each other almost perfectly. Not one of these manuscripts is exactly the same in Greek content. (weak textual evidence). However, this material may be freely used for personal study or research purposes. So in modern, more reliable, translations we lose 1 John 5:7, ( not in any Greek NT manuscript before 1500) and 1 Tim 3:16, . Readings are to be preferred that are found in a manuscript that habitually contains superior readings as determined by intrinsic and transcriptional probability. Naturally so because they were Greek textual scholars. There is no way manuscripts from all over the Roman empire from different centuries copied by people who had no contact with each other would all get basically the same text unless they all go back to the same autographs. As the Scottish biblical scholar Alexander Souter expressed it, they gathered up in themselves all that was most valuable in the work of their predecessors. Pastor Tobin Pederson, Reformation Day, October 31, 2007. Which group do you think would be more trustworthy? If we investigated the translators of the KJV we may be surprised at what we would find. Much has been written about them, but also their own recorded words shed light on their beliefs. 4. Westcott and Hort ExposedFROM THEIR OWN MOUTHS! To learn more about Bible versions and the many problems with modern translations, consider the following: David Otis Fuller, D. D. Which Bible Grand Rapids International Publications, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49501, David Otis Fuller, D. D. Counterfeit Or Genuine Mark 16? The fact is that the Westcott-Hort text represents the first widely-accepted departure from the Received Text in the post-Reformation era, and the modern English versions descend directly from the W-H text. They are not aware nor concerned that almost all the modern Bible versions of our day are built upon the Greek Text of Westcott and Hort, commonly called the Westcott-Hort text. A site defending Westcott and Hort against unnecessary and incorrect attacks. About 290 C.E., some of his associates made various subsequent alterations, which deliberately combined elements from earlier types of text, and this text was adopted about 380 C.E. I have used the NIV for comparison. () In many instances where I would disagree with the wording in the Nestle / UBS text in favor of a particular variant reading, I would later check with the Westcott and Hort text and realize that they had often come to the same decision. The fact is that the United Bible Societies (UBS) text is almost identical to the W-H text of 1881 IN SIGNIFICANT DEPARTURES FROM THE RECEIVED TEXT. The two editors favoured two manuscripts: Vaticanus and Sinaiticus. This knowledge also informs us that the New Testament was not written generally in posh language more a sort of popular tabloid type language.
Driving With Expired Tags In Sc,
Cmc 7050 Actuator Rebuild,
Articles W
