Hi, after a decade of riding a 2007 Giant Trance, I've finally upgraded my bike to a Merida One Twenty XT with 29" wheels. In front, this tire gives you a lot of float and very little rolling resistance for a faster kind of ride. This is a comparison of the Ardent versus some other fast rolling tires, albeit all in a narrower width as this comparison was for XC oriented tires: There was an interview of a Maxxis marketing guy on NSMB, he openly stated that he doesn't like the Ardent at all and there are better options from maxxis that do the same job better (Recon). Would you have this front with a dissector rear? That doesnt make the Ardent a worse tire, it just means that if you tend to ride loose terrain, are a particularly aggressive rider, or like coming into a corner just a little too hot, you may want to consider a tire that specializes in your riding style and conditions. Along with a spike-like design, most of the knobs or spikes also have generous siping, making sure those tall knobs conform to anything they can grab onto when the dirt gets slippery. For the rear, I opted for something a little lighter that I thought might be more likely to give it up in fast tight turns. The 2.25 size is truly an XC tire with the low profile tread, while the 2.4 size lends itself to be more of a trail tire or a fast-rolling rear tire. Maxxis Forekaster vs Ardent Like the Ardent, the Forekaster is tubless ready. A forum is a difficult place to get helpful information on tires. If the girl said no then the answer obviously is no, but she's not gonna say no. I will start with the faster rolling, smaller tread tires and continue into the heavier, knobbier tires that tend to have more traction. Overall Conclusion When it comes to deciding on tires, the order of importance for me personally is grip, durability, then rolling resistance. There are intermediate knobs but spaced out quite a bit more than the other tread, leaving a gap where there isn't an intermediate knob. Contrary to what another poster said, I wouldn't cheap out on tires. It was also a Maxx Terra while the 29er was a Maxx Speed, and I couldn't tell any difference in performance between the two. Thats why you go 2.6 if you have the room. Interbike 2017: Maxxis Rekon, Forekaster, Ardent Race - YouTube It's a trail tyre, through and through, sitting somewhere between the Crossmark and legendary Minion in terms of rolling speed/grip stakes. Apparently its now a tyre for short-travel trail bikes AKA downcountry bikes. The tread has been beefed up a little, and Maxxis now says it's designed for modern short travel trail bikes. MAXXIS Forekaster and Ardent Review - EXO TR 27.5 Michael B. Shame theyre quoting them as so heavy, the 292.4 is claimed at 945g, which puts it same weight as a Dissector and 2.3 DHR II. The Maxxis tire combo is a tough one to beat these days. While it may no longer be marketed as a wet conditions specific tire, the new Forekaster is still designed to shed mud well, with raised edges on the casing. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. The new Forekaster has certainly got closer spaced knobs but thats about the only thing theoretically less-wet-friendly about it. It also makes a great rear tire when looking for speed in the back and some more tread up front like what you would get with the Ardent, Ardent Race or Forekaster. When you really lean into it the square and H shaped side nobs dig in well and the extra volume helps conform to the trail. Maxxis Dissector. Marked as a 2.35, they dwarf just about all other non-downhill specific tyres out there. Pinkbike Poll: How Many Volume Spacers Do You Run? The good news is that the Maxxis Ardent takes patching well and will still perform well as a tire for months after applying a good tire patch. When an Aspen isnt enough tire but a Minion is too much, choose the new Maxxis Forekaster. However, the narrow casing and lack of tubeless options were lackluster at best. Hopefully, youre not more confused now than before you read this comparison. What they really didnt have was something like this, funnily enough. Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total). The Ardent is just a touch thicker than the Ikon, 2.4 compared to 2.2. Dual compound or 3C MaxxSpeed options 60 TPI or 120 TPI casing options EXO sidewall protection The center tread is ramped but tightly packed to roll fast with side knobs that have an alternating stepped pattern to them. Put in back and its durability and ability to take a hit really shine. I prefer less cornering grip in the rear than the front because as those of you who have rear wheel drive cars know; oversteer is fun! I would never run it as a front tire and the brief period that I have, it was filled with constant washouts. Its designed to handle a wide variety of terrains and trail styles without slowing the rider or offering a lot of rolling resistance.
Posted incocktail waitress jobs denver
maxxis forekaster vs ardent
